Atrott's Information Service

www.publishedauthors.net

 

 Links:

                  
 »  Books
 »  Biography
 »  Articles/Reviews
 »  News
» Events
» YouTube
 »  Index
To acquire the book

 "Jesus' Bluff"

click on the icon below

   









News

 

05/01/2009:The official release of my book "Jesus' Bluff" will be January 6, 2010. Orders can be placed since November 9, 2009.

---------------

05/01/2009:PublishAmerica -- the publisher of my book "Jesus' Bluff" --  is  going to  submit the book  to Oprah Talkshow and to the team of  Holywood producer Steven Spielberg.

---------------

05/01/2009:Yopi author Gemini reviews the German book of the German upholders of false moral standards Boenish and Leyendecker "The business of euthanasia" (Das Geschaeft mit der Sterbehilfe). The book so-to-speak has become a Bible to cumpulsive-obsessive anti-Atrottists.  Gemeni writes that I (Hans Atrott) frislty, are libeled in this book by the Germans. Secondly, the Germans did so because I am so famous pertaining to voluntary euthanasia, i.e. due to  very known German grudge.  Gemini says that the German book is not worth reading (see: http://www.yopi.de/rev/352436).

In German: Yopi Autorin Gemini rezensiert das Buch von Boehnisch und Leyendecker "Das Geschäft mit der Sterbehilfe", das eine Art Bible für Sterbehilfegegner und Anti-Atrott-Besessene in Deutschland geworden ist. Sie kommt zu dem Urteil, dass ich einmal in diesem Buch beleidigt werde und zum anderen, dass dies wegen meiner herausragenden (wörtlich: berühmten) Stellung für die Sache in Deutschland geschehen ist. Wörtlich schreibt sie: "Im Weiteren wird Kritik an der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Humanes Sterben geübt, die laut den Autoren sektenartige Züge aufweist. Zudem wird Hans Henning Atrott kritisiert, da er ein sehr berühmter Autor ist, der sich mit der Sterbehilfe auseinandersetzt. Da er eine so berühmte Stellung in der Sterbehilfe-Debatte hat, wird er von den beiden Autoren als Guru bezeichnet." Die Autorin gelangt zum Urteil, dass dieses Buch nicht lesenswert ist (vgl. http://www.yopi.de/rev/352436).

 -------------------

 Wikipedea as Weapon of Christian Sect

The online encyclopadia Wikipedia claims that I published my book in may own publishing Company. This would mean that I own America's biggest book publisher....

German: Wikipedia Waffe der Christensekte

Das Online-Lexikon Wikipedia behauptet, dass ich mein Buch "Jesus' Bluff" im Selbstverlag veröffentlicht hätte. Das bedeutet, dass ich den größten amerikanischen Buchverlag, der PublishAmerica schon geworden ist, besitzen würde... 

Letter to the editor of Wikipeda 12/16/2009

... Each American court will tell you that as an encyclopedia you have to comply with the language people speak and with the meaning people attach to words. Your “arguments” that you regard books published by a publisher by modern methods, e. g. by POD, as self-publishing does not help you.  You have not made Schneider by that before a court of a civilized country. This all the more is the case since  you nowhere explain your very special semantics of self-publishing. In that case, you have to explain wherever you use your special term of “self-publishing”.  As you use this term  in the article, each one either thinks that the author masters and finances the  process of the production of the book or owns the company publishing the book.  Knowing European languages I can state that the semantics you attach to the notion of self-publishing does not tally with the language John Bull and Brother Jonathan learn and use. The latter is decisive and not your excuses.

Quite the contrary, as an encyclopedia it is up to you to transform unique and special semantics of some people, which are content with your encyclopedia  into a language everybody understands. You do quite the reverse.  In addition, as far as your German volunteers are concerned, it is to put the question if they suffer from delusion of grandeur denying any greatness they do not have (themselves). Your German volunteers give the impression that they do this job on account of obsession being greater than those people about which they write. Such megalomania  is not free of charge. Apart from ridiculousness, in most cases, those types of individuals try justifying themselves by psychological projections, i.e. projecting their own faults  and defects on those which are topic of your encyclopedia. It is not up to an encyclopedia to promote verdicts on new matters but to report the general verdict of experts and the public. This is what your German Fuehrers are used to doing. An encyclopedia is no creator of verdicts  but an impartial reporter of them and in a way so that the average smart one can  understand the matter.

Cutting a long story short: The problem is not that Wikipedia does not match its own semantics about publishing and self-publishing. Who contests? What you argue is that you only have to comply with your very special semantics only you know.  Where is informed about your unique semantic on self-publishing? The problem is that Wikipedia does not comply with the standards (semantics) readers generally have and hereby misguides them to believe what is false and consequently, provides wrong information, at least as far publishing a book is concerned. It is not to assume that a court rules that the unique semantics of Wikipedia have to prevail on the English language.

What about if foreign publishers publish this book in their language and their countries what already is negociated? Do I also own those companies world-wide...?

--------------

November 2009: German Christian authorities raid the flat of my Son because of his Fathers' book "Jesus' Bluff"

Hardly my book "Jesus' Bluff - The Universal Scandal of the World (M. Magnes)" became announced, in November 2009, the German authorities again by perfidious pretext raided the apartment of my son. It is to assume that they either had a wrong information that I currently abode there, or they hereby wanted to get an address of mine. Suspiciously, it were the same authorities perpetrating Christian inquisition crimes of infringement of law on me already 15 or 20 years ago... Don't worry, you will not see me in Germany in order to bestow to me very "renowed"  Christian desperadoes'  "love" of the enemy...  By the way, Christians do not call themselves but the author incorrigible... 

That is what thinks each Swine, Jesus is the God of mine

The German NS-Fuehrers were trained Christians (most of them Catholics). Soviet Dictator Stalin was candidate for Catholic priesthood (he only missed the final examination). As far as big criminals have not been Christians while unleashing their depravity and criminality, they later detected Christian sect as their nature's home.  For example, in November/December 2009, in Laos there was a trial on a former desperado of the Red Khmer, who run a facility where oponents of the regime (about 50.000 individuals) incredibly became tortured systematically. In the meantime, this naturally borned criminal detected Christianity as corresponding with his depraved and criminal traits and joined the Christian sect, which exceeds everything regarding crimes.